We publish a number of informative and topical newsletters based around our service and business areas. It is important to us that we continually share ideas, information and best practice with our clients and contacts so everyone can benefit from news on new law, comment on topical events, and information on upcoming issues which will have a bearing on you and your business activities.
The content of these publications is for general information only and does not constitute advice on any specific matter. While every effort has been made to ensure the content of these publications is accurate and up to date, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to there accuracy or completeness and they are not a substitute for legal advice. You should seek specific legal advice on any particular matter which is relevant to you. We will not be liable for any losses arising out of any reliance placed on any content of these publications by you, or any person informed of the contents.
A landmark case in the Court of Appeal, Meltwater -v- The Newspaper Licensing Agency has created major uncertainty over when browsing the internet rather than explicitly copying content from it may constitute an infringement of copyright.
In the recent case of Hollister Incorporated et al. -v- Medik Ostomy Supplies Limited (published on 20 December 2011), the Patents County Court (PCC) clarified the principles governing an account of profits in England and Wales.
When is it reasonable to withhold consent in relation to a commercial contract? The recent case of Porton Capital Technology Funds -v- 3M UK Holdings Ltd has provided some guidance.
The Department for Work and Pensions has issued a consultation on a proposed method for equalising the Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) payable by occupational pension schemes. The unequal calculation of GMPs payable to men and to women has long been an issue faced by pension schemes. Our article considers whether the latest announcement takes us any further forward in the search for clarity on this issue. In December's pensions picture we commented on the delay to the auto-enrolment implementation timetable. The DWP has now issued the timetable and we comment on the detail.
The right to claim unfair dismissal provides important protection to employees. However, the amount of compensation that can be awarded is limited as was highlighted in a recent case before the Supreme Court. In a key decision, it held that an employee could not claim compensation for losses flowing from a breach of contract where the breach was related to the dismissal process. That would have given employees a choice of claims for unfair dismissal that could have bypassed the limits set on unfair dismissal compensation.