Gateley

publications

We publish a number of informative and topical newsletters based around our service and business areas. It is important to us that we continually share ideas, information and best practice with our clients and contacts so everyone can benefit from news on new law, comment on topical events, and information on upcoming issues which will have a bearing on you and your business activities.

The content of these publications is for general information only and does not constitute advice on any specific matter. While every effort has been made to ensure the content of these publications is accurate and up to date, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to their accuracy or completeness and they are not a substitute for legal advice. You should seek specific legal advice on any particular matter which is relevant to you. We will not be liable for any losses arising out of any reliance placed on any content of these publications by you, or any person informed of the contents.

9th May 2012

Parent company liability for asbestos claims

The Parent (Company) Trap: parent companies can be held liable to employees of their subsidiaries Case comment - David Brian Chandler v Cape Plc [2011] EWHC 951 (QB)

Download [PDF – 91kB]

27th April 2012

business news - Spring 2012

Welcome to the Spring 2012 edition of Business News.

Download [PDF – 315kB]

19th April 2012

construct - Spring 2012

Welcome to the Spring 2012 edition of construct produced by the construction team at Gateley.

Download [PDF – 278kB]

18th April 2012

stop press - National Planning Policy framework published 27 March

The National Planning Policy Framework 2012, designed to 'make the planning system less complex and more accessible, to protect the environment and to promote sustainable growth', was published on 27 March. In this special 'stop press' article, Zoe Walker highlights the key points for housebuilders.

Download [PDF – 511kB]

18th April 2012

sign on the dotted line

Some four years ago the Mercury case caused a stir among property circles, despite being a case which centred around the operation of a tax avoidance scheme. Read Callum Nuttall’s article which explores why Mercury has implications for property lawyers who make pre-completion amendments to previously executed documents.

Download [PDF – 2MB]